Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Apple Mac Mini Review (2018): A Video Editor’S Perspective

In the past times iv years, micro PCs guide maintain vastly improved, as well as most of the major manufacturers straightaway offering a tiny Windows machine. Still, I was impressed with the Mini's performance,
as well as it's the cheapest means to acquire a macOS machine. Despite this, the 2018 Mini has a few flaws that volition in all likelihood proceed it from beingness the best alternative for most people.


The most impressive thing close the novel Mini is its selection of ports. There's Ethernet, a headphone jack as well as iv USB-C connections (supporting Thunderbolt 3). It also sports a full-size HDMI port as well as ii old-school USB-3 Type-A ports. Apple has been hence aggressive close removing useful ports I was worried we'd meet a box with zip but a span of USB-C inputs. 

The connectivity options build the novel Mini piece of cake to customize, with the alternative to add together external SSDs, external GPUS or whatever else you lot mightiness need. Unfortunately, shared controllers hateful those Thunderbolt ports tin exclusively back upward ii displays but add together inwards the HDMI as well as you lot tin run iii 4K monitors from the Mini (or i 5K as well as i 4K display).

Compared to previous Minis, you lot exercise lose the analog microphone input, but considering USB-based digital-analog converters are plentiful as well as effective, that's non a huge loss.

I tested the entry-level $799 model, which comes with a quad-core, 3.6GHz Intel Core ii3-8100b processor, Intel UHD 630 graphics, 8GB of RAM as well as a 128GB SSD. Intel's b-series processors are soldered/integrated versions of their total desktop chips, as well as this i was pretty impressive, though the i3 model inwards my exam unit of measurement doesn't back upward either hyperthreading or turbo boost speeds, inwards example those things are of import to you.

Unlike the 2014 Mini, you lot tin upgrade the RAM inwards the novel model yourself, though it's challenging plenty that Apple recommends you lot guide maintain the move done at a service center. If you lot don't desire to pay Apple's toll for RAM (frequently ii to iii times marketplace rate) you lot tin exercise it yourself, but it'll accept a laid of Torx drivers as well as you lot can kiss your warranty goodbye.


Previous Mac Minis were positioned every bit low-cost computers for the dwelling trace of piece of occupation solid or office, as well as the novel model excels at those tasks. Its i3 chip is to a greater extent than than upward to treatment discussion processing, multiple browser tabs, video streaming as well as music playback. Unlike before models, though, Apple is clearly positioning the novel Mini every bit a machine for designers as well as other professionals. The company's website describes it every bit a "workhorse" as well as lists advanced rendering software similar Autodesk Maya as well as Luxion Keyshot alongside the apps that should meet improved performance. So the existent inquiry is: How does this reckoner perform compared to Apple's other "pro" machines? The respond in that location is a trivial tricky.

In Cinebench, which analyzes CPU as well as GPU processing for graphics rendering, the Mini did pretty well. In single-core CPU performance, it edged past times the i7 inwards a MacBook Pro and was exclusively close xv per centum slower than the Xeon chip inwards an iMac Pro. In multicore testing, though, the lack of hyperthreading was obvious, every bit the Mini savage xx per centum behind the MacBook Pro, as well as was exclusively i 3rd every bit fast every bit the iMac Pro.

Geekbench 4 single-core results were to a greater extent than encouraging, with the Mini's i3 outperforming the MacBook Pro past times a hair, as well as approaching the iMac Pro. In multicore, the Mac Mini was also exclusively close v per centum slower than the MacBook Pro, though it withal savage to a greater extent than than 50 per centum behind the iMac.

In fairness, the Mini costs less than a 3rd of either of these systems, as well as its i3 processor is to a greater extent than powerful than I would guide maintain expected, but piece the CPU mightiness guide maintain given a rigid performance, with graphics the Mini struggled. In Cinebench's GPU test, the Mini was exclusively able to care one-half of the MacBook Pro's performance as well as one-third of the iMac Pro.

Mac Mini2017 2.8GHz i7 

Mac mini 2017 2.8GHz i7 Macbook Pro Mac Pro 3.2GHz Xeon
Cinebench Single-Core 151 149 176
Cinebench Multi-Core 585 716 1671
Cinebench GPU 40.61 78.13 123.69 fps 

Geekbench painted a similarly disappointing picture. Against its OpenCL reckoner test, the integrated Intel graphics inwards the Mini were xl per centum slower than the MacBook Pro as well as scored exclusively close i 8th the speed of the iMac Pro.

Benchmarks are exclusively constituent of the picture, though. I'm non a programmer or a 3D designer, but I am a video editor, as well as to provide a real-world exam I edited an episode of Engadget Today on the 2018 Mini using Premiere Pro.

The Mini performed meliorate than I expected. Cutting footage, moving it roughly the timeline as well as basic playback were all smooth. It fifty-fifty played dorsum 4K footage from my Sony FS5 with barely a hitch. The limitations of the machine drib dead especially apparent when I began adding titles as well as color-correction. Premiere Pro (and most editing software) relies heavily on the GPU to homecoming real-time previews in i lawsuit you've started modifying the footage with color as well as effects. That proved to hold upward a existent challenge for the Mini, as well as the preview playback became increasingly choppy every bit I added fifty-fifty basic effects. Reducing the playback resolution helped a bit, but at a sure point, the footage only became challenging to move with.

On i exam of 4K footage using color, correction, a blur as well as a title, the Mini managed to display exclusively 10 per centum of the frames during a 10-second playback. And forget close working at double speed (which many editors exercise to relieve time); in i lawsuit effects were added, the sound wouldn't fifty-fifty play if I tried to preview faster than real-time. Even using proxies (low-res temporary files inwards a format that should hold upward easier for the programme to read) barely helped the situation.

When exporting the footage, a chore that to a greater extent than often than non doesn't rely heavily on the GPU, the Mini performed better. Despite the effects as well as color correction, Engadget Today came out with no glitches, though it took nearly iii times every bit long every bit it does on the iMac Pro.

Another test, transcoding a CineForm file to MP4, worked fifty-fifty better: The Mini was only slightly slower than my MacBook Pro, as well as close one-half every bit fast every bit the iMac Pro.

The lack of a dedicated graphics processor genuinely seems to hold upward the weak indicate here, as well as unfortunately, there's no piece of cake means to rectify that. 

There are exclusively iii processors available for the Mini, as well as no alternative to add together a discrete GPU. An extra $300 on the base of operations model we've been testing volition acquire you lot a 3.2 GHz six-core processor with hyperthreading as well as Turbo Boost upward to 4.6 GHz. 
That's in all likelihood plenty speed to exit the MacBook Pro inwards the dust, as well as should give the Mini some serious CPU processing power, but it won't improve the graphics performance at all. Apple is clearly expecting some people volition utilization the Mac Mini with an external GPU, but that's at to the lowest degree an additional $500, as well as hooking upward a bulky box with its ain fans as well as ability provide seems to defeat the role of a compact machine.

For a sense of how hapless the graphics performance is, I tried i to a greater extent than test, Unigine's Valley benchmark. 

This is the most recent exam available for macOS, as well as piece Unigine's benchmarks are intended every bit extreme stress tests for gaming graphics performance, Valley is from 2013, hence it's non precisely cutting-edge. Even so, on the lowest "basic" settings, at 1,280 x 720 resolution, the 2018 Mini could exclusively care xx frames per second. Switching to "Extreme" at 1920x1080, that dropped to a sad four. Four frames per second. This is definitely non a organization for gaming.

Configuration options as well as the competition

Beyond the processor, in that location are a few other components you lot tin upgrade. It costs $200 to double the RAM to 16GB, which mightiness hold upward a worthwhile decision, as well as you lot tin pass upward to $1,400 extra for 64GB if you lot genuinely demand it (64GB RAM kits are difficult to uncovering right now, but only $329 volition acquire you lot 32GB if you lot don't purchase from Apple). You tin also pay thousands for a larger SSD, but with the issue of Thunderbolt ports, I'd only recommend an external RAID or SSD.

If you lot don't tending close having OSX, in that location are Mini PC alternatives that tin provide to a greater extent than graphics power. Intel's Hades Canyon NUCstarts at $719 but doesn't come upward with storage as well as RAM. What it does guide maintain is i of Intel's new Kaby Lake G chips. These are built from an unlikely alliance betwixt Intel as well as AMD as well as conjoin an Intel eighth-gen processor to an AMD Vega GPU. They pack a remarkable amount of performance into a small-scale SoC, as well as it's frankly strange this chip isn't an alternative inwards the 2018 Mac Mini, considering AMD graphics are already used inwards the higher-end iMac as well as MacBook Pros.

If you lot aren't interested inwards gaming as well as you lot genuinely desire a professional person Mini system, HP's Z2 Mini G4 packs the same six-core i7 processor, 16GB RAM, as well as 512GB SSD every bit a $1,699 Mini, but also includes a pro-grade Nvidia Quadro GPU as well as tin hold upward establish for $100 less.

If you're inwards the marketplace for a novel organization as well as are committed to macOS, the 2018 Mini does guide maintain a few selling points. At $799, the base of operations Mini nosotros tested is the cheapest means to acquire a novel Mac today. Despite its hapless graphics performance, the Mini's base of operations processor is solid, as well as the available $300 upgrade is non a bad means to acquire a fast six-core processor that should proceed the Mini feeling speedy for years. Aside from 3D modeling as well as video editing, Apple mentions XCode as well as Music production on their website, as well as these genuinely appear similar compelling use-cases for the Mini. CPU-dependent tasks similar coding as well as sound engineering build sense for this organization as well as wouldn't hold upward held dorsum past times its specs.

When Apple unveiled the Mini, it floated the thought of chaining multiple Minis together into a "Mini" server, as well as for serious CPU-based issue crunching, that's genuinely an intriguing idea. Four Mac Minis upgraded to an i7 as well as 16GB of RAM would acquire you lot 24 cores with 48 threads as well as 64GB of retention for exclusively $200 to a greater extent than than the eight-core iMac Pro. You would demand a pretty specific workload to accept wages of a setup similar this (office server? Code compiler? Render farm?), but it's an interesting concept.


Apple's ain marketing materials refer to the novel mini every bit "part racehorse, all workhorse," as well as though they didn't drib dead every bit far every bit branding this the "Mac Mini Pro" Apple is clearly positioning it every bit a high-performance computer. This makes the lack of a reasonable GPU all the to a greater extent than confounding. Graphics performance is of import for designers as well as media producers (in fact, both Autodesk Maya as well as Final Cut Pro tin exercise goodness greatly from an OpenCL capable GPU), but graphics cards also ability OpenCL or CUDA based compute performance. These types of GPU-driven issue crunching are increasingly useful for scientific computing as well as information analysis tasks similar encryption, paradigm recognition, optimization as well as machine learning.

For music producers as well as people writing apps inwards Xcode, perchance the novel Mini makes sense, but I don't imagine most other "pro" users volition hold upward happy with this bird of performance. I can't aid but milkshake my caput at Apple's charts as well as graphics showing off how much faster the novel Mini is than the 2014 model. Not exclusively exercise a lot of the benchmarks they've published exclusively highlight CPU intensive tasks (rendering inwards Keyshot, exporting from Final Cut) instead of actual workflows, but they're also comparison a $4,300 2018 Mini with a six-core processor as well as 64GB of RAM to a 2014 machine that couldn't fifty-fifty trounce its ain 2012 predecessor. Four years later, I'd sure promise the novel model would hold upward faster.

Maybe this highlights the best professional person utilization example for the novel mini. H5N1 rendering machine that tin handgrip CPU intensive tasks similar compiling code as well as rendering graphics, but that you lot wouldn't genuinely desire to exercise your daily move on. When Apple unveiled the Mini, it floated the thought of chaining multiple Minis together into a "Mini" server, as well as for serious CPU-based issue crunching, that's genuinely an intriguing idea. Four Mac Minis upgraded to an i7 as well as 16GB of RAM would acquire you lot 24 cores with 48 threads as well as 64GB of retention for exclusively $200 to a greater extent than than the eight-core iMac Pro. You would demand a pretty specific workload to accept wages of a setup similar this (office server? Code compiler? Render farm?), but it's an interesting concept.

For full general consumers, the Mini seems to create total the role of the trace of piece of occupation solid unit of measurement reckoner inwards the living room; a small, reliable desktop that should experience speedy as well as accept tending of basic work. But with many people having laptops or tablets, how essential is that whatever more? As a media box, $799 is quite a lot to spend, the aforementioned Apple TV is an easier means to stream, as well as fifty-fifty a Roku box tin acquire you lot Netflix as well as play MP4s off a pollex crusade for $100. If performance doesn't thing to you lot at all, hence the novel MacBook Air or fifty-fifty an entry-level MacBook Pro mightiness hold upward a meliorate choice.